FOREX NEWS

HOMEFOREX NEWS


How the United States Can Become a Crypto Leader?

The week of the terraUSD (UST) crash was one of the most traumatic in cryptocurrency history - and one we'll remember for a long time. It wreaked havoc on the cryptocurrency market, wiping off billions of dollars in value. While people in Washington, D.C. debate next steps, a sensible, serious discussion about prospective regulation is necessary.

Stablecoins are a critical innovation that offers several benefits to users while also giving the US a competitive advantage. Stablecoins increase payment and transfer efficiency, lowering costs and speeding up settlement for businesses and consumers. They make the financial system more accessible by allowing anyone, regardless of their background or economic standing, to participate. They can also serve US geopolitical goals by bolstering worldwide dollar dominance in the face of moves by foes like as China and Russia to undercut US financial leadership.

Stablecoins are supposed to be steady and trustworthy, as their name suggests. Stablecoins can be classified into two types: custodial and decentralised.

Custodial stablecoins are backed by collateral held in a bank or other organisation and issued by a central administrator. Stablecoins are typically fully collateralized, with the issuer holding one dollar in the bank for every one dollar in stablecoins issued. Custodial stablecoins account for the great majority of total stablecoin volume, and they are extremely stable and dependable if the issuer is trustworthy and transparent.

Stablecoins that are decentralised are intended to address the fact that not all issuers are trustworthy or transparent. Their purpose, like the public blockchains that enable them, is to reduce reliance on trusted financial intermediaries, who often cause more harm than benefit. They accomplish this by creating stablecoins that, rather than relying on a central issuer, strive to maintain their peg to the dollar through the use of autonomous code. Decentralized stablecoins are often backed by other digital assets kept programmatically as collateral on the blockchain, rather than cash in a bank.

Importantly, despite the fact that custodial and decentralised stablecoins employ different methods, neither is fundamentally superior to the other. Each has its own set of characteristics - both advantages and disadvantages – that come together to create a robust, competitive market characterised by consumer choice. In both categories, we should encourage prudent innovation.

UST, on the other hand, was in a class by itself, relying exclusively on an algorithmic process to maintain price stability with no collateral, a hazardous concept that many anticipated would fail.

So, what should policymakers do in the aftermath of this month's events?

First, policymakers should follow the process outlined in President Joe Biden's executive order (EO) earlier this year, as US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen stated in congressional testimony on May 12. The EO, which directs federal agencies to examine crypto and report on regulatory priorities and solutions, gives clear direction on how to approach stablecoin regulation carefully. This is a significant and ongoing project. Policymakers should establish a strong grasp of the stablecoin area and the main differences between various stablecoin designs with the support of feedback from industry players and trade associations like my employer, the Blockchain Association. Before effective regulation can be formulated, this is an essential first step.

Second, in Congress, a bipartisan consensus should be created. Following the failure of UST, Congress became divided on the subject on both sides of the aisle. Crypto, on the other hand, is too big for partisan politics, as my colleague Kristin Smith recently argued. We need leaders from both parties to come together and figure out the best way to regulate cryptocurrency. A regulatory solution must come from Congress, not the regulatory agencies, as the President's Working Group on Financial Markets (PWG) urged in its report on stablecoins last year.

Third, new regulations that are appropriate for the situation should be adopted. These regulations must be balanced and take into account the importance of dollar-dominated stablecoins to financial security in the United States in the next decades. Stablecoins require specialised regulatory frameworks that meet their unique benefits and hazards. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) have suggested specialised frameworks for custodial stablecoins, which are excellent examples of savvy regulatory approaches from both sides of the aisle in the Senate and House of Representatives. Similarly well-tailored frameworks for decentralised stablecoins can be developed over time.

Stablecoins provide far too much of a risk for us to take the chance of getting them incorrect as a matter of policy. The United States is competing with other countries to be the home of Web 3. It's time to think strategically and take action. The United States' status as a worldwide crypto innovation engine is in jeopardy.

Leave a Comment :


Cancel
Trustpilot

We will provide you latest market updates and analysis, for that you can JOIN OUR TELEGRAM CHANNEL and get daily profit and more facilities. If you want to JOIN TELEGRAM CHANNEL, click here to join.